
Cisco N9K-C9336C-FX2 vs FX2-RF: What’s the Difference?
Cisco N9K-C9336C-FX2 vs FX2-RF: What’s the Difference?
Cisco’s Nexus 9000 Series switches have become foundational for modern data centers, providing high performance, scalability, and flexibility. Within this series, the N9K-C9336C-FX2 and N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF models are often compared due to their similar designations but distinct features. This article breaks down the differences between these two switches to help network engineers and IT decision-makers choose the right fit for their environment.
Overview of Cisco N9K-C9336C-FX2 and FX2-RF
Both switches belong to the Cisco Nexus 9300 line and provide 36 ports with 100Gbps capacity. They are designed for high-density data center applications and support advanced networking features including VXLAN, Segment Routing, and automation integration.
Despite their similarities, the N9K-C9336C-FX2 and N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF serve slightly different use cases, which is crucial to understand before making a procurement decision.
Key Differences Between N9K-C9336C-FX2 and FX2-RF
1. Port Configuration and Speed
- N9K-C9336C-FX2: This model offers 36 fixed 100GbE QSFP28 ports. It is designed to deliver maximum throughput with consistent port speed suitable for core and aggregation layer switches.
- N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF: While also featuring 36 ports, the FX2-RF version supports flexible port configurations that allow for a combination of 100GbE and 40GbE speeds. This flexibility lets users optimize port speeds based on specific network demands.
2. Use Case and Deployment Scenarios
- N9K-C9336C-FX2: Best suited for environments requiring uniform 100GbE connectivity, such as data center core switches or high-speed aggregation layers where maximum throughput and simplicity are key.
- N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF: Ideal for deployments needing variable speed configurations. This flexibility makes it suitable for edge or spine layers where a mix of port speeds might be necessary to connect diverse devices.
3. Flexibility and Future-proofing
The FX2-RF variant’s support for multi-rate ports offers enhanced future-proofing. Enterprises can gradually migrate from 40GbE to 100GbE without replacing the entire switch, saving cost and minimizing disruption.
Common Features Shared by Both Models
Despite their differences, the N9K-C9336C-FX2 and FX2-RF share several critical features:
- High-density 100GbE Ports: Both deliver 36 ports to support large-scale data centers.
- Cisco NX-OS Operating System: Providing advanced network services and programmability.
- Low Latency and High Throughput: Optimized for demanding applications including cloud, AI, and big data.
- Advanced Security and Automation: Including features like role-based access control (RBAC) and integration with Cisco DNA Center for simplified management.
How to Choose Between N9K-C9336C-FX2 and FX2-RF?
Selecting the right switch depends largely on your network design and future plans:
- Choose N9K-C9336C-FX2 if you need consistent, full-speed 100GbE ports with straightforward deployment and predictable performance.
- Opt for N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF if your network requires flexible port speeds, gradual upgrade paths, or mixed-speed environments.
Summary Table of Differences
Feature | N9K-C9336C-FX2 | N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF |
---|---|---|
Ports | 36 x 100GbE fixed | 36 ports with flexible speeds (40GbE/100GbE) |
Ideal Use Case | Uniform 100GbE networks | Mixed-speed environments |
Upgrade Flexibility | Limited | High |
Deployment Focus | Core and aggregation | Edge, spine, hybrid |
Conclusion
The Cisco Nexus N9K-C9336C-FX2 and N9K-C9336C-FX2-RF switches are both powerful options within the Nexus 9000 Series. Understanding the nuances between fixed 100GbE ports versus flexible multi-rate ports is key to making an informed decision.
For enterprises prioritizing maximum throughput with consistent port speeds, the FX2 model fits well. Meanwhile, organizations that anticipate evolving network needs and desire adaptable connectivity options will benefit from the FX2-RF’s flexibility.
Choosing the right switch ensures optimized data center performance, better cost management, and future readiness in today’s fast-changing networking landscape.